How we rate
Centring every child, human control and oversight in the design of technology in schools

Technology in schools should empower and enable all rather than select and limit some. ETTOL supports technology in schools with critical human oversight, as one part of a much wider range of ways to teach and learn. Technology should not be all there is in schools. ETTOL exists to prompt more attention to child-centred design and review in edtech. Our view is that child-centred design is what should be celebrated. AI in edtech is changing quickly, and parents and teachers need information now. ETTOL is not a benchmark for marketing.
Companies should set out where their responsibility starts and stops. They should aim to know how their tools behave for different groups of children, and say what was tested, with which children, and how, and what has not been tested. They should say how they know that overlaps between groups, for example a child who is both disabled and learning English, are not affecting their results. The schools white paper (opens in a new tab) sets out SEND training for all school staff because that training is needed. So a company cannot assume that every teacher is already able to catch what a tool gets wrong for pupils with diverse strengths and needs, and a tool's design should not rely on it. Where a company passes that responsibility to the user, users should be told.